There was a time when arriving at a hotel was an event in itself. A doorman opened the carriage door. Luggage disappeared into the hands of uniformed porters. Guests entered beneath chandeliers into vast marble lobbies filled with flowers, conversation and the quiet clinking of glasses. Dinner required dressing properly. Letters were written on hotel stationery. And the concierge was expected to know not only the city, but seemingly everyone worth knowing within it.
The grand hotel was more than somewhere to sleep. It was a stage on which wealth, travel, fashion, diplomacy and society all met.
From London and Paris to New York, Venice, Cairo and Singapore, the great hotels that emerged during the late 19th and early 20th centuries represented something genuinely new: a level of comfort previously associated with private palaces made available to the international traveller.
For several decades, they stood among the most glamorous places on Earth. This was the golden age of the grand hotel.
When travel became glamorous
The grand hotel could not have existed without a revolution in travel. During the 19th century, expanding railway networks transformed journeys that had once taken days into comparatively comfortable trips of hours. Steamships connected continents with increasing regularity, while wealthy Europeans began travelling in numbers that previous generations could hardly have imagined.
Tourism was becoming an industry. But affluent travellers had expectations.
They wanted the standards of a great private house while away from home: servants, fine food, beautiful rooms, privacy and increasingly modern conveniences. Hotel entrepreneurs recognised the opportunity.
Across Europe, railway stations, fashionable resorts and capital cities began acquiring enormous hotels designed not simply to accommodate travellers but to impress them.
The railway brought the guest to the city. The grand hotel took over from there.
César Ritz and the reinvention of luxury
Few names are more closely associated with this transformation than César Ritz. The Swiss hotelier understood something that remains fundamental to luxury hospitality today: true luxury is not merely expensive decoration. It is the feeling that everything has been anticipated.
Ritz worked at some of Europe’s leading hotels before becoming involved with London’s Savoy, where he worked alongside the legendary French chef Auguste Escoffier. Together, they helped redefine what sophisticated hotel hospitality could look like.
Ritz subsequently opened the Hôtel Ritz Paris in 1898, followed by London’s Carlton Hotel in 1899.
His influence was so considerable that his surname eventually became an adjective. To call something “ritzy” was to associate it with glamour, luxury and fashionable society.
But the revolution went beyond chandeliers and expensive dinners. Bathrooms became increasingly important. Electric lighting was incorporated into luxury properties. Service became more discreet and personalised. Great restaurants were no longer merely places to feed hotel guests; they became destinations in their own right.
The modern luxury hotel was beginning to take shape.
The great hotels become stages for society
By the beginning of the 20th century, certain hotels had become institutions. The Savoy opened in London in 1889 and quickly became associated with theatrical stars, aristocrats, wealthy Americans and fashionable society.
In Paris, Ritz Paris became synonymous with the international elite. Across the Atlantic, New York developed its own grand hotel culture, culminating in institutions such as The Plaza.
But the phenomenon was international. Hotel Danieli offered visitors an appropriately theatrical Venetian setting. Raffles Singapore became one of Asia’s legendary hotels. In Cairo, grand European-style hotels catered to travellers heading toward Egypt’s ancient monuments.
These buildings became meeting places between worlds. Royalty encountered industrialists. Writers watched politicians over breakfast. Actors drank beside aristocrats. Adventurers returned from distant expeditions and told their stories in hotel bars.
To know where to stay was itself a form of social knowledge.
Dressing for dinner
Perhaps nothing illustrates the difference between the grand hotel of the past and the modern hotel more clearly than dinner. Today, a guest might walk from their room to a five-star hotel restaurant wearing trainers and a T-shirt without attracting much attention.
A century ago, the evening represented a transformation. Men changed for dinner. Depending on the period and establishment, evening dress might mean white tie or, increasingly, the dinner jacket. Women appeared in evening gowns. Dining rooms were elaborate social environments in which appearance and etiquette mattered.
Dinner was not something squeezed between sightseeing and sleep. It was part of the reason for being there.
Menus could stretch across numerous courses. Champagne flowed. Orchestras played. Cigars and digestifs might follow dinner, while conversation continued in drawing rooms, lounges and bars. The hotel was effectively a private club to which one temporarily belonged.
The lobby was the social network
The grand hotel also flourished because the world had yet to become permanently connected. There were no smartphones, social networks or instant messages. Information travelled through newspapers, telegrams, letters and conversation.
The hotel lobby therefore performed a function that is difficult to reproduce today. People watched people.
Guests encountered acquaintances unexpectedly. Business relationships developed over drinks. Newspapers from different cities arrived each morning. Visitors asked concierges about theatre tickets, restaurants and introductions.
Simply sitting in the right lobby could connect a traveller to the social life of an unfamiliar city. The best hotels became information exchanges for the international elite.
The concierge knew everything
One of the enduring characters of grand-hotel culture was the concierge. A truly exceptional concierge could arrange theatre tickets when performances were supposedly sold out, secure a table at a fashionable restaurant, organise transportation, find a doctor, deliver flowers or solve the dozens of small crises that accompany travel.
The guest did not necessarily need to understand how something was achieved. It simply happened.
That philosophy remains at the heart of traditional luxury hospitality. Technology can make reservations faster, but knowing exactly what a particular guest wants – and solving unusual problems discreetly – is something considerably harder to automate.
The best service was almost invisible.
Hotels as temporary homes
Many wealthy guests did not stay for a night or two. They stayed for weeks or months.
A grand hotel could function as a seasonal residence. Families arrived with enormous trunks, wardrobes and sometimes personal servants. Suites became temporary homes while their occupants moved through the social calendar.
This helped create a very different atmosphere from today’s transient hotel experience. Regular guests knew the staff. Staff knew their preferences.
A returning gentleman might expect his preferred newspaper, drink or room without needing to ask. Relationships could continue over decades. The distinction between hotel and home became deliberately blurred.
Writers, spies, actors and kings
The mythology of the grand hotel owes much to its guests. Hotels naturally attracted people who lived mobile lives: writers, diplomats, performers, businessmen, politicians and members of royal families.
Writers found them particularly irresistible. Hotels offered anonymity and observation simultaneously. A writer could disappear into a room while having an endless procession of human behaviour available downstairs.
Hotel bars consequently became part of literary culture.
Ernest Hemingway became associated with the Ritz in Paris. Oscar Wilde spent his final years moving through Parisian hotels. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s writing captured the glamour and instability of wealthy hotel life. Later, figures such as Noël Coward helped cement the connection between hotels, performance and sophisticated metropolitan life.
During wars and political crises, the role of the hotel became stranger still. Diplomats negotiated inside them. Correspondents filed reports from them. Intelligence officers observed one another across bars and dining rooms.
A grand hotel could occasionally resemble a miniature geopolitical stage.
The architecture was part of the experience
Modern luxury often emphasises minimalism. The grand hotel did almost the opposite. Architecture announced arrival.
Sweeping staircases, marble floors, gilded ceilings, enormous chandeliers, palm courts, ballrooms and richly furnished lounges were designed to make the guest feel that they had entered somewhere significant.
Even circulation through the building could become theatrical. Guests descended staircases into public rooms where they could see—and be seen.
The building was not simply a container for bedrooms. It was part of the performance.
The end of the golden age
There was no single moment when the grand hotel’s golden age ended. The First World War profoundly disrupted the European social order that had sustained many of these institutions. The interwar period produced another burst of glamour, particularly during the 1920s and 1930s, but the world was changing.
The Second World War brought another rupture.
After 1945, commercial aviation gradually replaced ocean liners and long railway journeys for international travel. Tourism became available to a much larger part of society. Hotel chains expanded and standardisation became valuable. The very nature of luxury changed too.
The aristocratic codes that governed dress and behaviour weakened. Formal dining became less formal. People travelled with fewer servants and eventually with much less luggage.
By the late 20th century, convenience was increasingly winning against ceremony. And yet the grand hotel never disappeared.
Why we still love grand hotels
Walk into the lobby of the Savoy, Ritz Paris, Raffles or another surviving grand hotel today and something interesting happens. For a moment, the modern world feels slightly further away.
There are still doormen. There are still concierges. Afternoon tea continues beneath chandeliers. Martinis are stirred in bars where generations of travellers sat before us. Of course, much has changed.
The contemporary guest expects Wi-Fi, climate control, gyms, spas and technology that would have appeared miraculous to a Victorian traveller. Dress codes have relaxed enormously. Luggage consists of suitcases rather than trunks.
But the fundamental attraction remains surprisingly similar. A great hotel makes ordinary activities feel significant. Having breakfast becomes breakfast at the Ritz.
Having a drink becomes a martini at the American Bar. Going to bed means walking through a lobby, greeting a doorman and taking an elevator to a room overlooking one of the world’s great cities.
That transformation of the ordinary into an occasion may be the grand hotel’s greatest achievement.
The new grand hotel
There are signs that travellers are rediscovering some of what was lost. Luxury hospitality has increasingly embraced history, craftsmanship and highly personalised service. Historic properties are being restored rather than replaced. Hotel bars have regained cultural importance. Travellers who can stay anywhere increasingly want somewhere with a story.
Perhaps this reflects a broader reaction against standardisation. For decades, the international hotel industry promised travellers consistency: the same mattress, breakfast, television and service whether they were in London, Dubai or Singapore.
Consistency is useful. But it is rarely romantic. The old grand hotels offer something different. Their imperfections, histories, rituals and accumulated stories cannot easily be replicated by constructing another glass tower.
You do not merely stay in them. You become, briefly, part of their history.
A disappearing art worth preserving
The golden age of the grand hotel belonged to a world that in many respects should remain in the past. It was intensely hierarchical, accessible to very few and built around social conventions that modern society has largely abandoned.
Yet something valuable existed within it.
People dressed for occasions. Hospitality was considered a craft. Beautiful public rooms mattered. Service depended on human knowledge rather than an app. Dinner could occupy an entire evening. Travelling somewhere was allowed to feel important.
The finest grand hotels still preserve fragments of that world. Perhaps that explains why, more than a century after many of them opened, we continue walking through their doors.
We are not simply buying a room for the night. We are buying a small piece of the golden age.
Read more:
